#347 Rubber and Amazon EC2

The best way would be to add a rubber template to the mix. You can check out the existing templates here: https://github.com/wr0ngway/rubber/tree/master/templates

Another method would be to simply spin up a server with rubber, ssh in and setup faye manually.

Andrei Misarca almost 7 years ago

Thanks for the reply. It might sound silly, but can you access the server via ssh? I haven't tried it yet, but I am considering moving my application to EC2.

Thanks again.

Adam O'Connor almost 7 years ago

I haven't watched the episode yet but I wouldn't see why not. SSH is standard for any linux setup I've worked with. Also typically Capistrano uses it for tunneling.

Yea! That's my favorite part of rubber, it doesn't abstract anything away from you.

tunneling in, use your ec2 keypair and ssh root@name, i.e.: ssh -i ~/.ec2/gsg-keypair root@app01.foo.com

Once you're in, you can find all your config files where they're supposed to be or your app in the /mnt directory.

Luiz H. D. Costa almost 7 years ago

Hey, Ryan, thanks for the episode!

This may be a silly question, but does rubber also install all we need in the EC2 to deploy?

Thanks in advance.

Yes. Rubber hooks into capistrano and installs all the packages that are needed for the given template. Adding more aptitude packages is easy and all contained within the Rubber config files.

Luiz H. D. Costa almost 7 years ago

Wow, that's really sweet.

Thanks for the help.

Tim Warren almost 7 years ago

Awesome!

Brian Harris almost 7 years ago

Sorry if this is a noobish question, but why is the application being split into web, app, and db instances? I don't really understand that part. Is that just for Amazon or cloud-based load balancing, or is that something that I should be doing on a VPS? Thanks

splitting up the web app and db instances in rubber is more about how Rubber handles 'roles'. There can also be a redis role, a resque role, a sphinx role etc. It allows rubber to be very modular and scalable. You can place different roles on different hardware for instance.

Brian Harris almost 7 years ago

Okay, thanks Scott.

Jim J almost 7 years ago

Thanks Brian, for breaking the noobish question ice. Here's another one: Would anybody care to weigh in on the pros & cons of this EC2 service vs. using a VPS? Or maybe offer a link to an article that hits this question?

Thanks everybody and thanks again Ryan.

This is a big topic.

The simple aspect that my experience lends is just a very scalable system. With rubber, I have roles for each aspect of my application and spinning up a new server to handle more application resources takes minutes. Interfacing ec2's with other amazon services is ridiculously easy. Scaling horizontally and vertically is simplified especially with tools like Rubber.

I've been using Rubber for a bit over a year now and absolutely love it. Version 2.0 is a huge improvement as well.

Alexander Zaytsev almost 7 years ago

Do you have experience with installing RMagick with Rubber on an instance? What is the best way to do it? I can simply ssh to the instance and install it manually, but it doesn't feel right.

There's a much better way.

First off, make sure you have rmagick in your gemfile.

Then in your rubber.yml file there should be a setting for 'packages'. Somewhere around line 189. You can simply add aptitude packages in this array.

Add to the array, 'imagemagick' and possibly libmagick9-dev. Simply cap rubber:bootstrap your instance and it will install these packages for you along with the new gem in your gemfile. Paperclip and other image processing should be good to go.

Also. There's a wealth of rubber information on the google discussion group from the last few years. http://groups.google.com/group/rubber-ec2

Note, you can also install packages on a template by template basis. Like only installing imagemagick when you are using passenger etc. The rubber.yml packages line will install it on all your severs.

Alexander Zaytsev almost 7 years ago

Thank you very much, Scott!

I had to add "libmagickwand-dev" as well to make it work.

Rubber seems to be a really great tool :)

Henry Jacob over 6 years ago

'libmagick9-dev' is no longer available, adding 'imagemagick, libmagickwand-dev' to packages: in rubber.yml is worked for me.

weblee almost 7 years ago

Ill add another new question re rubber.

If you start of with a small app so only one server required for all roles how well does rubber handle breaking this up once hopefully you start to get bigger. ie creating separate roes for App, Web & DB.

Would you have to convert your existing role to be just DB??

Also what about auto scaling. Is there a way to have rubber auto scale app and db slave servers if required?

And one more to chuck in what about setting up staging environment?

But like Alexander has said this seems a great tool.

I've done all these things in the past year so I'll pitch in.

The best part of using ec2's is you can get your servers to a stateless point. Where you can drop your existing servers at the drop of the hat if they have redundancies.

If you were to have a web, app, db server. to split that up you'd start by setting up a new db server where it's solely db and dump your current db over there. I personally love using RDS so I always have a separate db setup to host and I never have to worry about it. Alternatively, you could setup a slave on a separate server and then promote it later.

You can then set up more separate app servers, which become part of the network so they'll be managing some load but still working with the web role on the original server.

Finally, you can pull out the web role into it's own and the two web servers will work fine and you can drop one seamlessly.

Auto scaling is a bit different. Amazon does have ways of flashing your current image and they'll start up a new one if certain requirements are met. I haven't played with this as much. As long as you're paying attention, you can scale yourself really quickly in rubber without any new configuratio.

Staging environment is just like any rails env. set up a new staging.rb file in the environments and when you do cap rubber:create_staging, prefix it with RUBBER_ENV=staging cap rubber:create_staging so it setups up an entire rubber configuration within that environment. Separates out the instance yaml's and everything.

weblee almost 7 years ago

Thanks Scott, Going to give rubber a go I recon.

kcoop almost 7 years ago

I'm just starting to look at rubber, but it looks like it's doing much of what I was building by hand. Can you share how you configured it to work with RDS?

Nicolai Seerup over 6 years ago

Hi Scott.

I need to install Libsndfile as a binary instance... How is that done, do you know?

Romain Banchereau almost 7 years ago

Thank you for this very nice cast. Rubber is impressive and makes great use of Capistrano's power. Can it handle non-rails applications and other cloud providers (I am guessing no and no)?

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Hi. I'm one of the rubber devs. It can handle non-Rails applications just fine. I've personally deployed a couple Sinatra apps with in. And I even use Rubber to manage a few servers that just run Java apps and quite a few Windows machines on EC 2 (note that Rubber can only create/destroy/reboot Windows -- no app deploy).

It is currently EC 2 only. Part of the rubber 2 revamp was to base it on fog, which opens up the opportunity to run on a lot more providers. But, as of yet, we haven't done the work to finish this up. It's on the docket though.

Romain Banchereau almost 7 years ago

Very nice! Looking forward to the upcoming releases.

David Burton almost 7 years ago

NOOB - when I'm creating the EC2 instance, Amazon wants me to select a AMI (stack). Which one do you select?

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Rubber should handle this for you. By default, the current version of rubber (2.0.1) uses ami-3c994355, which corresponds to the 64-bit instance-store Ubuntu 12.04 LTS image.

Feel free to hop onto #rubberec2 on Freenode and I'll try to help out.

Panggi Libersa Jasri Akadol almost 7 years ago

AMI code for a kind of Image is different in each region, for example:

Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Singapore:
64 bit: ami-a4ca8df6, 32 bit: ami-a6ca8df4

Northern Virginia:
64 bit: ami-a29943cb, 32 bit: ami-ac9943c5

I got the codes when i try to launch a new instance from AWS console and copy it. But maybe there's a better way to get it :)

David Burton almost 7 years ago

NOOB - Getting error
* executing "sudo -p 'sudo password: ' bash -l -c 'cp /home/ubuntu/.ssh/authorized_keys /root/.ssh/'"
servers: ["50.17.145.140"]
.. ** Failed to connect to 50.17.145.140, retrying
* executing `rubber:_allow_root_ssh'

I believe my credentials are correct.

If I look at the EC2 console it says the private ip is 10.111.63.18

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

You'll get these for a bit. There's a delay between when Amazon indicates the machine is available and when we can actually SSH into it. If it doesn't resolve itself after a few minutes, then something is wrong. But if you only see them for a couple minutes, it's nothing to worry about. EC2 is pretty variable about instance startup time.

Jonathan Spooner almost 7 years ago

Yeah I have the same problem despite the instance being available. I'm able to ssh to it.

          bash
        
. ** Failed to connect to IP_SNIP, retrying
  * executing `rubber:_allow_root_ssh'
  * executing "sudo -p 'sudo password: '  bash -l -c 'cp /home/ubuntu/.ssh/authorized_keys /root/.ssh/'"
    servers: ["SNIP"]

Jonathan Spooner almost 7 years ago

I was using a previous aws key-pair and for some reason creating one named gsg-keypair fixed the problem.

Todd Holdman about 6 years ago

+1. Just hang in there. I was getting nervous because the server had actually been running (green light in the UI) on AWS for awhile. It did eventually kick in.

Gustavo Honorato over 6 years ago

First check if your private key is in ~/.ec2 directory.
After, try to remove the .pem extension from your private key file.

Orban Botond about 6 years ago

Dave H almost 7 years ago

Once again, you read my mind with this week's episode topics! Thanks a ton Ryan, keep up the great work.

andreteves almost 7 years ago

Thanks a lot Ryan! This episode is just amazing! I was looking for a tutorial like this for months!

Chimere Okoro almost 7 years ago

Thank you, just what i was looking for.

Thanks, great cast, and just in time for me.

When I configure AMI for us-east-1 things seems to work. But if I change the aws: to region: eu-west-1 even the staging fails with a AMI ID '' does not exist. Any ideas how to solve this? Also what shall I specify for time zone instead of US/Eastern

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

The AMIs only work in the region they were created in. If you want to use us-west-1 with Ubuntu 12.04, the AMI you want is ami-e7712aa2.

Check out the sidebar on http://alestic.com/ to get a listing of Ubuntu AMIs by region and type.

The timezone setting is just the standard set of timezone mappings from Ubuntu. If you're on the west coast, I guess "America/Vancouver" would do what you want.

As I am in Europe! I would like to use eu-west-1. I can't get that to work. If I simply switch to us-east-1 it works. Why is that?

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Please hop on the rubber user list [1] and I'll try to help you out there. Sorry, I misread what you typed earlier as us-west-1. The eu-west-1 AMI is ami-1de8d369 (again, taken from http://alestic.com/).

[1] -- http://groups.google.com/group/rubber-ec2

Panggi Libersa Jasri Akadol almost 7 years ago

Kevin, the last time i checked, AMI for eu-west-1 for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64 bit is ami-e1e8d395 and 32 bit is ami-e7e8d393 :)

robbied72 almost 7 years ago

What kind of cost could I expect for a small site with say between 100 and 500 hits per day? Would it work out cheaper than a linode vps in this case?

Jason Wong almost 7 years ago

I would like to know how to match my own domain name instead of foo.com.

Thanks.

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Modify the "domain" setting in config/rubber/rubber.yml.

Jason Wong almost 7 years ago

how do i point the domain to ec2?? just linking the ip or do i need to set up an extra dns server??

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

You don't need DNS out of the box since rubber will write your host entries to /etc/hosts. But if you do want DNS, rubber can manage that as well. Look at the config/rubber/rubber-dns.yml template to get started.

Brian M. Clapper almost 7 years ago

@robbied72, for the first year, it'd be much cheaper, since you can most likely get away with the Amazon free tier, which gives you a micro instance free for a year.

robbied72 almost 7 years ago

Thanks Brian, will give it a shot.

How to config rubber to utilize the free tier? In rubber.yml it seems you can only choose between m1.small not m1.micro

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Sorry, that comment in config/rubber/rubber.yml is misleading. You can use any instance type. Although "m1.micro" doesn't exist -- it's "t1.micro".

http://groups.google.com/group/rubber-ec2

sorry about the t :-)

When using m1.small things work great. But when using t1.micro the web role server fails miserably on bootstrap. Hangs while doing rubber config. Cant't go beyond the transforming collectd.conf. Any ideas?

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

No worries. It's kinda hard to really try to debug what's going on here. Mind joining the mailing list and asking there?

Thanks.

I did, but I don't see my message there !?

msg below:

Hi I have been trying to use the t1.micro image_type on eu-west-1, using the ami-e1e8d395. I can create and bootstrap and even deploy app role servers and db role servers. But unable to even bootstrap the web role server.

It gets stuck while running ./script/rubber config is being run. If I ssh to the server the rvm process is a zombie. If I kill it and run locally I get the same result. Below is what I get when running:
FILTER=web01 cap rubber:booystrap

lots of stuff...
** [out :: web01.foo.com] Resolving deltas: 100% (58/58), done.
command finished in 200394ms
triggering after callbacks for deploy:update_code' * executingrubber:passenger:remove_config_ru'
** No servers for task remove_config_ru, skipping
* executing "sudo -p 'sudo password: ' bash -l -c 'cd /mnt/fz-
production/releases/20120508214814 && RUBBER_ENV=production RAILS_ENV=production ./script/rubber config --force --file=\"role/ collectd\"'"
servers: ["web01.foo.com"]
[web01.foo.com] executing command
** [out :: web01.foo.com] Rubber[INFO]: Transforming /mnt/foo- production/releases/20120508214814/config/rubber/role/collectd/
collectd-ping.conf
** [out :: web01.foo.com] Rubber[INFO]: Transforming /mnt/foo- production/releases/20120508214814/config/rubber/role/collectd/
collectd.conf

How to solve this?

http://groups.google.com/group/rubber-ec2

I switched to us-east-1 and changed AMI accordingly. Guess what, It worked on the first attempt. I tried the eu-west-1 numerous times but always getting stuck at the above. Strange! The only explanation I can think of is that the AMIs aren't identical.

I used:
ami-a29943cb for us-east-1
ami-e1e8d395 for eu-west-1

In the EU setup all servers ended up in eu-west-1a (as there are 1a, 1b, 1c) so that cannot be the issue.

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Sorry. The list is moderated because Google Groups is a spam haven. Your message has gone through now.

Brian M. Clapper almost 7 years ago

I've actually run into a similar problem. Rubber blows up toward the end, with:

          
        
 ** [out :: production.doctrfindr.com] fail
 ** [out :: production.doctrfindr.com] 
 ** [out :: production.doctrfindr.com] ]
 ** [out :: production.doctrfindr.com] 
    command finished in 394ms
failed: "/bin/bash -l -c 'sudo -p '\\''sudo password: '\\''  bash -l -c '\\''service haproxy start'\\'''" on production.doctrfindr.com

So, now, I'm off to join the mailing list. ;-)

Rob Bastian almost 7 years ago

Hi!

Is haproxy required for the web role? Put another way, can I use nginx/apache + passenger for the web role skipping haproxy altogether?

Thx!

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

Rubber generates config into your project. By default we set up HAProxy, but you're welcome to delete that and reconfigure the web server ports. I do that currently: I have apache listen on 80 & 443 and use mod_cluster to some TorqueBox servers.

Trevor Hiley almost 7 years ago

Kevin, do you have anything you could point me to as far as blog posts or documentation on how you went about setting up torquebox on EC2? I've fallen in love with torquebox in the last couple days and I want my ultimate destination to be EC2. It would be nice to use Rubber to help manage this. I see you've created a torquebox template, I'm just wondering if you have any documentation on how you've used it and how well it has worked for you. Thanks!

Geoffroy Montel almost 7 years ago

EC2 comes with Elastic Load Balancing, it would be nice to use it instead of a web role.
Is it feasible ?

sicikle almost 7 years ago

Noob getting this error

** [out :: production.genlink.com] rake aborted!
** [out :: production.genlink.com]
** [out :: production.genlink.com] FATAL: role "GenLink" does not exist
** [out :: production.genlink.com]
** [out :: production.genlink.com] Tasks: TOP => environment
** [out :: production.genlink.com]
** out :: production.genlink.com
** [out :: production.genlink.com]
command finished in 16651ms
failed: "/bin/bash -l -c 'cd /mnt/GenLink-production/releases/20120509093404 && bundle exec rake RAILS_ENV=production RAILS_GROUPS=assets assets:precompile'" on production.genlink.com

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

It's really hard to provide support here. If you wouldn't mind, please ask the question on the mailing list:

It looks like your role configs might have gotten out of whack. But, hard to to say with just that snippet.

apchester almost 7 years ago

How does rubber handle adding an extra database instance? Does it automatically copy over the data and add itself as a slave?

Additionally, does the standard rubber config offer failover or would I need to add this in?

Kevin Menard almost 7 years ago

It's really up to you. But we handle the single master, multiple slave setup out of the box for both PostgreSQL and MySQL. All you need to do is add a machine with the appropriate slave role (e.g., postgresql_slave) and it'll auto-configure it for async streaming replication from your master. The config is all generated in your project though, so if you want to change to streaming replication, for instance, just modify the generated file and you're good to go.

Geoffroy Montel almost 7 years ago

Excellent episode. I'm looking forward a "part 2" where you would explain how to set up your own templates!
Thanks!

Jonathan Spooner almost 7 years ago

Is there a reason rubber uses haproxy and not the Amazon Load Balancer? Are there any benefits from using haproxy and is it possible to use the Amazon Load Balancer with rubber?

andreteves almost 7 years ago

Very nice episode! But why does rubber upload code to all instance? I would expect it to upload the files only for the instance with the app role.

danigb almost 7 years ago

Awesome episode Ryan! You rocks! ... And awesome gem. Congrats!

Haider Sabri almost 7 years ago

this was a great episode. I'm going to give it a try. Two areas that i would be interested in knowing if rubber supports are integrating with ELB and AutoScaling. Any insights from smarter people on this?

thanks

Anton Dimitrov almost 7 years ago

Hey, thanks for the episode. After running the command below:

cap rubber:create_staging

I get the following error:

connection failed for: production.foo.com (Net::SSH::AuthenticationFailed: root)

Assuming that it has something to do with the fact that Ubuntu would not allow a root user to ssh by default I changed my config/deploy.rb file to use ubuntu as user. However, after that I get a similar error:

connection failed for: production.foo.com (Net::SSH::AuthenticationFailed: ubuntu)

Does someone have an idea about why this could be happening. I think it may be related to the ssh keys used but to me things seem ok with them.

Anton Dimitrov almost 7 years ago

In case someone is interested, the problem was due to Mac OS 10.7.3 in my case. They changed the DNS resolve order at some point and now at first place is not /etc/hosts but your local DNS server or something like that. So, production.foo.com is resolved as pointing to a real host using this domain name. I changed foo.com to something non-existent in several rubber config files to solve this problem. Also edited /etc/hosts to have the new domain name I am using.

Yang Wen over 6 years ago

Hi, could you write down more about how to I changed foo.com to something non-existent in several rubber config files to solve this problem. Also edited /etc/hosts to have the new domain name I am using. I am totally new to this stuff. thx

Ian Alexander almost 7 years ago

Hey great video really appreciate it - trying to figure out how to get past these two errors, wondering if you could point me in the right direction:

Rubber[INFO]: Transformation executing post config command: function error_exit { exit 99; }; trap error_exit ERR
config : 'option forwardfor' ignored for proxy 'passenger_proxy_ssl' as it requires HTTP mode.

Here is my deploy.rb
http://pastebin.com/6CdCP7DY

and here is my rubber.yml file
http://pastebin.com/7tUcrMqF

Let me know if you need any additional info...thanks!

Jonathan Sutherland almost 7 years ago

I've been getting this error when trying to run the cap rubber:create_staging command. It runs for 20 minutes or so successfully, but breaks when it gets here:

executing "cd /mnt/EvrlistSite-production/releases/20120706050602 && bundle exec rake RAILS_ENV=production db:migrate"
servers: ["production.evrlist.com"]
[production.evrlist.com] executing command
** [out :: production.evrlist.com] rake aborted!
** [out :: production.evrlist.com]
** [out :: production.evrlist.com] FATAL: role "EvrlistSite" does not exist
** [out :: production.evrlist.com]
** [out :: production.evrlist.com] Tasks: TOP = > db:migrate
** [out :: production.evrlist.com]

Georgios Michalakidis almost 7 years ago

Ryan, thanks for another excellent railscast!

Hi everyone.. I have to say, setting it up initially wasn't very easy. Turns out rubber is not very happy with "complex" database.yml (with conditional environment if's etc..) or with hyphens in the app name which, at least when using mysql templates, confuse rubber.

After having fixed a few annoying issues - and separating the credentials, I now have a weird issue (and a question below):

The problem I hope someone can shed some light on:
cap rubber:create_staging runs without errors. However, it ends with the same output as rubber:bootstrap does. i.e. the last command is:
* executing "sudo -p 'sudo password: ' bash -l /tmp/create_master_db"
and never actually fires up an apache/passenger to run my app.. and thus the link is not accessible.
Also, a bit above, collectd throws an error:
** [out :: production.foo.com] Starting statistics collection and monitoring daemon: collectd
** [out :: production.foo.com] configfile: stat (/etc/collectd/conf.d/*.conf) failed: No such file or directory

Can collectd be the reason why my app doesn't actually start? I'm using rubber 2.0.5 by the way. Or may it be that it requires me to run another command to get things started (even on staging)?

And the other question:
I'm using the complete_passenger_mysql template - which hopefully includes everything - but was tempted to use complete_passenger_nginx_mysql - any benefit in doing this instead??

Will DelHagen over 6 years ago

Typo in ASCII-Cast

          terminal
        
$ mkdir ~/.ec2
$ mv ~/Downloads/gsg-keypair.gem ~/.ec2/gsg-keypair
$ chmod 600 ~/.ec2/gsg-keypair

gsg-keypair.gem should be gsg-keypair.pem

diglett over 6 years ago

I used this tutorial for the free tier, and didn't even finish it due to errors, but I was still charged $40 at the end of the month for barely a couple days of using this service. I terminated my instances within a few days of using rubber. Even the default small instances are only $0.08/hr.

Please can someone tell me what I am doing wrong here?

Thanks!

Devan Flaherty over 6 years ago

diglett,
Did you create your instances using the AMI-Type : m1.small or any other option other than t1.micro?

The t1.micro is the free ami-type

Nicolai Seerup over 6 years ago

Anybody knows what this error is about?

          ruby
        
AuthFailure => AWS was not able to validate the provided access credentials (Fog::Compute::AWS::Error)

happens on
cap rubber:create_staging

is this supposed to be filled in

fog:
credentials:
provider: rackspace
rackspace_api_key: 'XXX'
rackspace_username: 'YYY'
image_type: 123
image_id: 123

Nicolai Seerup over 6 years ago

switched the secret access key and access key.... works

Yang Wen over 6 years ago

Anybody know why this happen ?

          
        
 ** Instance production created: i-219f8421
Waiting for instances to start..................
 ** Instance running, fetching hostname/ip data
  * executing `rubber:_allow_root_ssh'
  * executing "sudo -p 'sudo password: '  bash -l -c 'cp /home/ubuntu/.ssh/authorized_keys /root/.ssh/'"
    servers: ["54.248.63.94"]
.... ** Failed to connect to 54.248.63.94, retrying
  * executing `rubber:_allow_root_ssh'
  * executing "sudo -p 'sudo password: '  bash -l -c 'cp /home/ubuntu/.ssh/authorized_keys /root/.ssh/'"
    servers: ["54.248.63.94"]

Gustavo Honorato over 6 years ago

First check if your private key is in ~/.ec2 directory.
After, try to remove the .pem extension from your private key file.

Sebastian Schuartzman over 6 years ago

Hi all,

Running cap rubber:create_staging

I get this error:

Missing rule, creating: {"source_group_name"=>"blog_production_default", "source_group_account"=>"1072835180", "protocol"=>"tcp", "from_port"=>"1", "to_port"=>"65535"}
[DEPRECATION] 'account:group' argument is deprecated. Use {account => group} or just group instead
/home/user/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/excon-0.16.4/lib/excon/connection.rb:290:in `request_kernel': The security group 'blog_production_default' does not exist (Fog::Compute::AWS::NotFound)

Does anybody know whats going on?

Thanks!.

Dennis Ondeng over 6 years ago

@Sebastian its probably too late for you, but for anyone else with this problem, It happened to me and the reason was I was using my user name for the account field as opposed to my AWS account number. I'm assuming that if the account number is wrong, a similar error will ensue.

William Limratana over 6 years ago

Minor not that may help folks if you aren't familiar with yml files (I am not) :

if you want to put your AWS account, access key, and secret access key in enviornment variables, you must use the <%= %> brackets to access them. For example :

access_key: <%= ENV["AWS_ACCESS_KEY"] %>

This is unlike other rails configuration files. I'm not quite sure why since yml files look ruby-ish.

Karthik KC over 6 years ago

Hello,

I followed all the steps, and when I visit the ip address ( or domain name set in hosts ) I get apache server's default page "It works". I did not get rails app.

I have an EC2 tiny instance with ubuntu 12.04 in it.

Please help.

rahul dess almost 5 years ago

HI Karthik,

I have the same issue, did you figure out why its happening ? when i put "production.foo.com" in url...it shows the same message as yours. Please help !

Justin Tyler Wiley over 6 years ago

One thing that caused me some consternation: a misnamed keyfile.

When you create the keypair at Amazon, the name listed on amazon must match the filename locally.

Also, Ryan removes the .pem extension, from gsg-keypair...and Rubber does not tack .pem onto what you define in rubbery.yml.

So in short, make sure the key files names match everywhere.

Alek Grinberg about 4 years ago

I'm trying to resolve this issue now, are you saying not to remove .pem like Ryan does?

Yacobus Reinhart about 6 years ago

I have few questions to rubber template:

when i run with template "complete_passenger_nginx", it asked me which database with error. Just for information, i use RDS Amazon for MySQL service. so I choose "complete_passenger_nginx_mysql".

At here, rubber is generated successfully. My ec2 is installed on ubuntu 64bit and rbenv (not rvm). But I confuse, if autoscaling will use rbenv to control my passenger. Because i check in config/rubber/passenger.yml, it uses rvm not rbenv.

How i can make my rubber uses rbenv to control my ruby, rails and passenger, not rvm and native ruby? will it be problem when scaling is run, if i left rvm as default configuration for my passenger?

Many Thanks,
Yacobus Reinhart

kmamit about 6 years ago

Can anyone please reply why rubber commands do not work in eclipse terminal...

I am getting this -
$ rubber vulcanize complete_passenger_postgresql
ERROR: No such sub-command 'vulcanize'

See: 'rubber --help'

kmamit about 6 years ago

Getting this error - Please help me

** [out :: production.foo.com]
** [out :: production.foo.com] /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongo-1.3.1/lib/mongo/connection.rb:518:in connect' ** [out :: production.foo.com] : ** [out :: production.foo.com] Failed to connect to a master node at production.foo.com:27017 ** [out :: production.foo.com] ( ** [out :: production.foo.com] Mongo::ConnectionFailure ** [out :: production.foo.com] ) ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongo-1.3.1/lib/mongo/connection.rb:656:insetup'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongo-1.3.1/lib/mongo/connection.rb:101:in initialize' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongo-1.3.1/lib/mongo/connection.rb:152:innew'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongo-1.3.1/lib/mongo/connection.rb:152:in from_uri' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config/database.rb:89:inmaster'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config/database.rb:22:in configure' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config.rb:273:inconfigure_databases'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config.rb:94:in from_hash' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config.rb:109:inblock in load!'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config.rb:108:in tap' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/config.rb:108:inload!'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid.rb:147:in load!' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/mongoid-2.4.5/lib/mongoid/railtie.rb:84:inblock in class:Railtie'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/initializable.rb:30:in instance_exec' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/initializable.rb:30:inrun'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/initializable.rb:55:in block in run_initializers' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:ineach'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:in run_initializers' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/application.rb:96:ininitialize!'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/railtie/configurable.rb:30:in method_missing' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/graylog2-web-interface-0.9.6p1/config/environment.rb:6:in'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:240:in require' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:240:inblock in require'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:223:in block in load_dependency' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:640:innew_constants_in'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:223:in load_dependency' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:240:inrequire'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/application.rb:83:in require_environment!' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/commands/runner.rb:40:in'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/commands.rb:63:in require' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194/gems/railties-3.1.3/lib/rails/commands.rb:63:in'
** [out :: production.foo.com] from ./script/rails:6:in require' ** [out :: production.foo.com] from ./script/rails:6:in'
command finished in 172775ms
failed: "/bin/bash -l -c 'sudo -p '\''sudo password: '\'' bash -l /tmp/bootstrap_graylog_web'" on production.foo.com

rich833 about 6 years ago

Did you get this fixed? I'm having the same issue!

Heber Massami Nunomura about 6 years ago

I'm having the same issue. Does someone knows the answer?

skwasha about 6 years ago

I'm betting you're trying to deploy to an instance with 8GB of storage (like a T1.micro)? Try adding the following to config/rubber/role/mongodb/mongodb.conf:

  smallfiles = true

carlosmendes about 6 years ago

Hi,

I've the same problem.

I'm trying to deploy to an instance with 8GB of storage (T1.micro).

Adding 'smallfiles = true' to config/rubber/role/mongodb/mongodb.conf did not work for me.

Did someone solve this problem?

holgersindbaek about 6 years ago

Same problem here. Submitted it as an issue on the gem - https://github.com/rubber/rubber/issues/319.

@carlosmendes @skwasha @Heber Massami Nunomura @rich833 @kmamit Did you get it to work and how?

Edit

If I do cap deploy afterwards, then it deploys and works fine, but this issue should probably be fixed

carlosmendes about 6 years ago

cap rubber:bootstrap

solved the problem.

holgersindbaek about 6 years ago

@carlosmendes Did you do that before or after you did cap rubber:create_instance?

carlosmendes over 5 years ago

after (sorry for the late reply)

HaasEffect about 6 years ago

Same problem here. If I run "cap deploy" after a failed "cap rubber:create_staging" deployment I'll get the following error:

** [out :: production.blog.com] rake aborted!
** [out :: production.blog.com] could not connect to server: Connection refused
** [out :: production.blog.com] Is the server running on host "production.blog.com" (10.210.xxx.xx) and accepting
** [out :: production.blog.com] TCP/IP connections on port 5432?

Any other ideas how to fix this Mongo::ConnectionFailure? The last time I deployed (4-5 months ago everything worked like a charm). Updated to latest rubber version.

rich833 about 6 years ago

When I install the Rubber gem, I only have access to the config command. I.e. I can't call Vulcanize. See my post on Stack Overflow for a print screen: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14522051/rails-rubber-gem-no-such-sub-command-vulcanize/14536914#14536914

Does anybody know how to fix this? It sounds like it could fix @kmamit's problem above too.

Dung Quang about 6 years ago

Thanks Ryan for great post. This railscast give me the most valuable 9$ per month :)

Orban Botond about 6 years ago

In my last deployment I received this:

[Thu Mar 14 03:34:18 2013] [warn] default VirtualHost overlap on port 8080, the first has precedence
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] [Thu Mar 14 03:34:18 2013] [warn] default VirtualHost overlap on port 7001, the first has precedence
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] [Thu Mar 14 03:34:18 2013] [warn] default VirtualHost overlap on port 7000, the first has precedence
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] [Thu Mar 14 03:34:18 2013] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:8443 has no VirtualHosts
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** out :: staging.absolutecommerce.comAddress already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:7000
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] no listening sockets available, shutting down
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] Unable to open logs
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] Action 'start' failed.
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] The Apache error log may have more information.

[
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] fail
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com]
** [out :: staging.absolutecommerce.com] ]

Can anybody tell me how to solve the problem?

Anders about 6 years ago

I get the following error after running "cap rubber:create_staging

/Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/expects.rb:10:in response_call': Unable to find group 'blog_production_default' (Fog::Compute::AWS::NotFound) from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:332:inresponse'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:226:in request' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/idempotent.rb:12:inerror_call'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/base.rb:10:in error_call' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:239:inrescue in request'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:200:in request' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/idempotent.rb:12:inerror_call'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/base.rb:10:in error_call' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:239:inrescue in request'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:200:in request' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/idempotent.rb:12:inerror_call'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/middlewares/base.rb:10:in error_call' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:239:inrescue in request'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.20.1/lib/excon/connection.rb:200:in request' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.10.0/lib/fog/core/connection.rb:21:inrequest'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.10.0/lib/fog/aws/compute.rb:384:in _request' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.10.0/lib/fog/aws/compute.rb:379:inrequest'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.10.0/lib/fog/aws/requests/compute/authorize_security_group_ingress.rb:54:in authorize_security_group_ingress' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.10.0/lib/fog/aws/models/compute/security_group.rb:104:inauthorize_port_range'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/cloud/fog.rb:182:in add_security_group_rule' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/thread_safe_proxy.rb:13:inmethod_missing'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/security_groups.rb:218:in block (2 levels) in sync_security_groups' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/security_groups.rb:214:ineach'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/security_groups.rb:214:in block in sync_security_groups' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/security_groups.rb:208:ineach'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/security_groups.rb:208:in sync_security_groups' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/security_groups.rb:51:insetup_security_groups'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:268:in block in create_instance' from <internal:prelude>:10:insynchronize'
from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:267:in create_instance' from /Users/anderskitson/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p374/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.2.4/lib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:230:inblock (2 levels) in create_instances'

holgersindbaek about 6 years ago

A little warning.

Have been playing around with rubber and using this great tutorial as a guide. Create 3 instances and forgot about them for some weeks... BANG, amazon send me a whopping bill of $168.

Play around with the t1.micro instance and not the instances that are being played around with in the rails cast!

Ben Crudo almost 6 years ago

Hi Ryan,

I was hoping you could weigh in here, I'd like to create a rubber capistrano recipe to deploy my rails app using nginx and phusion passenger enterprise edition. The main problem I have is changing the rubber tasks to install the passenger gem from a local file instead of from the open-source repo. If you could please provide some guidance I would be very appreciative.

alonzorz almost 6 years ago

Help please,
followed the tutorial but when I use cap rubber:create_staging I get the following error:

Creating instance ami-b6089bdf/c1.medium/likeme_production_default,likeme_production_web,likeme_production_web_tools,likeme_pr
oduction_production,likeme_production_apache,likeme_production_app,likeme_production_passenger,likeme_production_collectd,likeme_p
roduction_common,likeme_production_monit,likeme_production_db,likeme_production_postgresql,likeme_production_postgresql_master,lik
eme_production_elasticsearch,likeme_production_examples,likeme_production_graphite_server,likeme_production_graphite_web,likeme_pr
oduction_graylog_elasticsearch,likeme_production_graylog_mongodb,likeme_production_mongodb,likeme_production_graylog_server,likeme
_production_graylog_web,likeme_production_haproxy/us-east-1
/home/alon/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p429/gems/excon-0.22.1/lib/excon/middlewares/expects.rb:10:in `response_call': Expected(200) <=> A
ctual(400 Bad Request) (Excon::Errors::BadRequest)

Pat Conley almost 6 years ago

alonzorz... have you resolved this? I am running into the same problem.

Shyam Visamsetty almost 6 years ago

even I am seeing the same problem.

Luke Marsh almost 6 years ago

Any fix for this?

tamirha almost 6 years ago

does any one had that problem after using the rubber:create ?
ruby-1.9.3-p429/gems/excon-0.23.0/lib/excon/middlewares/expects.rb:10:in `response_call': SecurityGroupLimitExceeded => You have exceeded the number of VPC security groups allowed per instance. (Fog::Compute::AWS::Error)

Thanks.

http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/VPC_Appendix_Limits.html

I also got same error. You found any solution ??

Thiago Leite Luiz almost 6 years ago

Any solution?

versiempre almost 6 years ago

Try uncommenting and putting in values for :web_tools_user and :web_tools_password in rubber.yml. It solved the problem for me.

Fernando David Irías Escher over 5 years ago

This is a limit enforced by Amazon that does not exist in the EC2-Classic setup.

You will have to contact them to increase this restriction.

Garrett Roach almost 5 years ago

in rubber.yml:

          
auto_security_groups: false
isolate_security_groups: false

http://www.flaskofespresso.com/2013/08/rails-rubber-aws-ec2-deployment-issues-with-groups-and-rules/

Hi
I followed this tutorial, but I found error.

c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/lib/excon/midd lewares/expects.rb:10:inresponse_call': The key pair 'ginfy' does not exist (F
og::Compute::AWS::NotFound)
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/connection.rb:353:in response' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/connection.rb:247:inrequest'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib
/fog/core/connection.rb:25:in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib /fog/aws/compute.rb:385:in_request'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib
/fog/aws/compute.rb:380:in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib /fog/aws/requests/compute/run_instances.rb:119:inrun_instances'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib
/fog/aws/models/compute/server.rb:179:in save' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib /fog/core/collection.rb:52:increate'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/cloud/fog.rb:30:in create_instance' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/thread_safe_proxy.rb:13:inmethod_missing'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:311:in create_instance' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:230:inblock (2 levels) in create_instanc
es'

Why it is not found my key-pair pem file? Please help.

I solved this problem, but now I got another problem

c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/lib/excon/midd lewares/expects.rb:10:inresponse_call': MissingParameter => Source group ID mi
ssing. (Fog::Compute::AWS::Error)
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/connection.rb:353:in response' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/connection.rb:247:inrequest'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/middlewares/idempotent.rb:12:in error_call' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/middlewares/base.rb:10:inerror_call'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/connection.rb:260:in rescue in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/connection.rb:220:inrequest'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/middlewares/idempotent.rb:12:in error_call' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/middlewares/base.rb:10:inerror_call'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/connection.rb:260:in rescue in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/connection.rb:220:inrequest'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/middlewares/idempotent.rb:12:in error_call' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/middlewares/base.rb:10:inerror_call'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l
ib/excon/connection.rb:260:in rescue in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/excon-0.23.0/l ib/excon/connection.rb:220:inrequest'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib
/fog/core/connection.rb:25:in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib /fog/aws/compute.rb:385:in_request'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib
/fog/aws/compute.rb:380:in request' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib /fog/aws/requests/compute/revoke_security_group_ingress.rb:54:inrevoke_securit
y_group_ingress'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/fog-1.12.1/lib
/fog/aws/models/compute/security_group.rb:218:in revoke_port_range' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:381:inremove_security_group_rule'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:454:in block (2 levels) in sync_security_groups' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:437:ineach'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:437:in block in sync_security_groups' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:393:ineach'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:393:in sync_security_groups' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:254:insetup_security_groups'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/cloud/aws.rb:72:in before_create_instance' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/thread_safe_proxy.rb:13:inmethod_missing'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:267:in block in create_instance' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/1.9.1/monitor.rb:211:inmon_s
ynchronize'
from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l
ib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:266:in create_instance' from c:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rubber-2.5.2/l ib/rubber/recipes/rubber/instances.rb:230:inblock (2 levels) in create_instanc
es'